By Tim Benz
Mike Tomlin is renowned for his ability to say nothing while saying something. He is the king of the non-sound bite sound bite. He is the anti-Rex Ryan. No coach in the NFL enjoys avoiding the spotlight more than Tomlin. Heās the last coach in the world that would normally provide bulletin board material for an opposing team on purpose.
But this week, he may have done so by accident.
Yo see the only thing Tomlin hates more than making headlines is those who write the headlines. Tomlin loathes conceding a point of opinion to the media. Heās the kind of coach who would deflect credit away from a great throw and catch from Roethlisberger to Wallace, just to point out a running back who made a decent blitz pick up.
That way, heās acknowledging a good play from his team, but throwing the media off of whatever scent it may be on to generate a story. Also, it makes him look smart by trying to make whatever reporter asked the question look dumb for not noticing the ārealā reason for whatever angle the reporter is taking.
Itās page one of the coaching/media relations hand book.
Tomlin employed that tactic this week when fielding a question about Jets quarterback Mark Sanchez. Tomlin was asked why Sanchez was so good at avoiding the rush when the Jets won at Heinz Field last month. The Steelers sacked New Yorkās QB just once that day. Tomlin immediately rejected the implication that Sanchez did anything to account for Pittsburghās lack of sacks, and redirected the praise squarely at the feet of the teamās offensive coordinator, Brian Schottenheimer.
āI think it was coach Schottenheimer more than anything else. He moved the pocket. They booted him. They had some quick game,ā explained Tomlin. āBut itās not anything he did specifically against the Pittsburgh Steelers. It, quite frankly, is what they do any weekend.ā
Iām sure thatās the first time that Brian Schottenheimer (or any Schottenheimer for that matter) has been made out to be an offensive genius by comparison to a Steeler defense. Just ask New Yorkers! They abuse their offensive coordinator so bad, Bruce Arians probably thinks he gets off easy in Pittsburgh by comparison.
Some of Tomlinās players agreed with their coachās assessment of Sanchez.
āThey (the Jets) donāt want him holding the ball that long. Thatās why they run the ball as much as they do. Thatās why they run so many quicks and screens,ā said linebacker Lawrence Timmons.
That seems like bulletin board material for Sanchez to me. But thatās nothing new. Most in football continue to create reasons why Sanchez stinks, and why the Jets keep winning āin spiteā of the second year quarterbackās abilities. All heās done in his first two years is get to two AFC championship games. Just like a certain QB in this city. In fact Roethlisberger got edgy this week when he was asked to asses Sanchezās impact on New Yorkās wins this year.
āPeople get on him a lot. Itās always āRun the ball and manage the game, Mark.ā Well, no. To be a quarterback at this level and do what heās done, you donāt just manage the game,ā said Roethlisberger with a firm tone to his voice. It was pretty clear Roethlisberger was flashing back to a similar distasteful evaluation of his game when he won 15 of 16 starts his rookie season.
At least one other defensive player appeared to hold Sanchezās performance in Pittsburgh against the Steeler pass rush in higher regard than Tomlin and Timmons.
āMarkās playing great ball,ā said Pro Bowler Brett Keisel. āHeās extremely slippery. When he feels the pocket collapse, heās able to get out and make things happen.ā
Maybe Tomlin is right. Maybe Schottenheimerās offensive scheme beat Pittsburghās defensive approach. Maybe any scrub couldāve done what Sanchez did, so long as they were at least good enough to warrant an NFL contract. And if the Steelers want to explain away Sanchezās ability to avoid their rush as nothing more than a product of New Yorkās system, then thatās fine. But hopefully they donāt denigrate his abilities in all areas.
Granted, Sanchez may go out on Sunday and stink up the joint. But that doesnāt mean Sanchez stinks. Sure, heās not Ben Roethlisberger. But how many quarterbacks even come close to Big Ben anyway? If Sanchez is so incapable, how come in four victories versus Pittsburgh, New England, and Indianapolis this year he went 74-90 with six touchdowns and one interception?
And oh by the way, he was only sacked five times in those four games. Sorry coach Tomlin, that canāt all be scheme.








Article Comments
Comments Are Available Only To "Insider" Subscribers
Subscribe to the Insider on Pittsburgh Sports today for to leave and read comments, get the latest NHL rumors, exclusive real time updates, post game analysis, charts, prizes, and more!
Subscribe for as little as $7.95!